Tuesday, August 10, 2010
The End
Friday, July 30, 2010
What Next?
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Guilt
I completely agree with the author’s sentiment. I had the time of my life in Germany, but it has always been a bit uncomfortable to admit how much I loved it, or that I even studied there at all. Despite the atrocities that so many countries, including the U.S., have committed, it seems as though Germany will always be the one country we instantly think of when we imagine the worst possible crimes against humanity. The sheer magnitude of the war and the Holocaust absolutely blows me away, and the more I learn about that period in Germany’s history, I wonder how it happened. Sure, we know many of the reasons, including Europe’s long historical trend of anti-Semitism, Hitler’s charisma, the humiliating terms of the Treaty of Versailles, the economic woes of Weimar Germany, an enormously effective propaganda machine, and so on, but I still can’t wrap my head around the fact that all those different factors made the people of a modern twenty-first century nation commit such terrible atrocities. It wasn’t just Hitler and the Nazis. It was Germans, and save for the brave individuals and groups that risked their lives to help Jews and other victims, it was an entire people engaged in a collective act that killed millions and destroyed Europe. I walked all over Freiburg last semester, passing all kinds of people around town, and every single time I saw an elderly German man or woman, I thought you were there. You saw what happened. I rarely talked to these people and never heard anything about their lives, but I always perceived these older Germans in a certain way, intrinsically connecting them to the crimes committed nearly 70 years ago. I talked to my friends about this and I was so surprised to learn that some of them felt the exact same way when they encountered older Germans on the street. It wasn’t just once in a while. It was EVERY time we saw them. We instinctively linked these people to the worst parts of Germany’s past, and to me, it seemed to reaffirm the idea that collective atrocities deserve collective guilt. I’m sure many of the men and women we passed were only children during the war, or maybe not even born yet, but in my mind, I can’t separate them from what all Germans did and the burden all Germans bear. I suppose that’s why I feel guilty for loving modern Germany and the Germans I met there so much. They are not Nazis, but the past creeps in because Germany will always be infamous and its crimes will always weigh on the minds of observers, tourists, and guests like me, and that makes it hard to fully support, admire, or be proud of Germany.
Even with that barrier, I find it easier to respect Germany than the United States when considering the dark stains on both nations’ pasts. Germany will forever have both World Wars and the Holocaust on its conscience, and the U.S. will forever have its treatment of Native Americans, slaves, African-Americans, and countless people we’ve exploited, tortured, or killed in the many countries we’ve overthrown, invaded, waged war in, or otherwise affected. The thing I respect about Germany is that it accepts full responsibility for the atrocities it has committed, particularly during the Holocaust. Germany has officially apologized many times over and has paid billions in reparations to Holocaust survivors as well as to Israel. No German leader shies away from it, and some, like Willy Brandt, have become known for their emotional public actions of remorse and repentance. German schoolchildren learn not only the facts about the Third Reich, Hitler, and the Holocaust, but also their country’s responsibility for those crimes. Major cities and towns in German have Holocaust memorial museums and monuments as well as Jewish museums, and some, including Freiburg, have gold Stolpersteine (“stumbling stones”) implanted in the pavement in front of houses to commemorate the individual victims who once lived there and were deported or murdered. They make you “stumble,” and by doing so, they intrude on the everyday lives of Germans who weren’t even alive during the war, making them acknowledge the victims, look at their former houses, and remember what happened. None of these measures can ever erase Germany’s haunting history, but I can at least respect the genuine efforts of a nation that wants to repair some of the damage that forever changed the lives of so many people.
Stolpersteine in Freiburg. Kurt Lindemann, represented on the stone in the middle, survived.
In comparison, the U.S. has absolutely failed at addressing its historical wrongs. It can barely apologize, let alone offer reparations, to any of the people to whom apologies are due. A Senate resolution introduced in 2004 to formally apologize to the Native Americans has never been adopted, while similar measures on the issue of slavery express “regret” and make it clear that no restitution claims will be considered. Frankly, these efforts are bullshit. Half-hearted and centuries-late resolutions to address our crimes do no justice to the tremendous hardship and suffering that the U.S. has wrought against others, and any schoolchild knows that regret is not the same as an apology. At least seven southern states recognize “Confederate History Month,” a fact which seems to be tacitly accepted by everyone else even when some states in question neglect to mention slavery. These recognitions supposedly honor the unique character and way of the South while conveniently ignoring the truly horrific institution of slavery and its enduring legacy. I wonder how the world would perceive Germany if it declared “Third Reich History Month” and chose to glorify the German way of life while pretending the Holocaust never happened. I’m sure the world would look on in horror. The state of Bavaria has the longest Nazi past, but if any politician there attempted to honor that history, Germany would absolutely not tolerate it. Germans would not tolerate it. Such hypothetical actions would be considered despicable, and in the U.S., they are despicable. Sure, I respect the rights of individual people to be ignorant racists, but states and the federal government ought apologize for our crimes and publicly denounce politicians who disagree instead of turning a blind eye to them. There is no justification for slavery, abuse of Native Americans, or invading other countries and killing their civilians, but unlike Germany, we refuse to accept our rightful guilt and responsibility. I would rather live with the so-called “white guilt” than live with the knowledge that my government just doesn’t consider it necessary to apologize to the former and present victims of our crimes. Many countries have dark periods in their histories, but we are no better off by sweeping ours under the rug. We would be a stronger and braver nation if we attempted to address our wrongs through formal words and actions, and like Germany, maybe we’d finally begin to bear our burden with dignity.
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
The Ultimate Letdown
Things are pretty busy around here right now, but I should have another political post in the near future. Stay tuned - bis dann!
Monday, June 28, 2010
Die Weltmeisterschaft und Patriotismus
One night last spring, I went with some friends to a local Italian place that sold spaghetti bolognese for 1.80 Euros between 6:00 and 7:30 pm. It was one of our favorite little cheap places to eat, but it would always be super crowded as everyone tried to take advantage of the spaghetti deal. That night we were there, I asked a man sitting alone at a table if we could sit with him (which is a totally normal social practice there). I asked in German and he responded in a strange combination of French and German. We were all a bit bewildered, but he was nodding enthusiastically so we sat down anyway. He then went on to explain, in the same mixture of French and German, that he was French but was in town for a while. We were struggling a bit with the muddled language, so he asked us what he spoke and informed us that he spoke French, some German, and some Spanish. We answered English and his eyes lit up before he started chattering away and asking us about "Arsenal." We had no idea what he was talking about, but as soon as we realized he was pointing to his FC Barcelona jersey, we understood that he thought we were British and was asking us if we supported Arsenal, a major team in the English Premier League. We all started laughing and explaining that we spoke English, but were actually just Americans studying abroad in Germany. He then laughed and asked us where we were from, and when I said California, he immediately began listing all the Californian cities he knew. When he got to San Diego, he said, "Mais San Diego ist wirklich in Mexiko, ja?" Big laughs all around as I, my three friends, and our new dinner pal enjoyed some delicious and cheap spaghetti.
The point I'm trying to make in this long-winded reminiscence is that football brings Europeans (and the world) together regardless of language. It would have been so easy for us to politely ignore our table-mate and speak only in English to each other so he couldn't understand us, but instead, we figured out where we were all from, what we were all doing in Freiburg, why we liked this restaurant (1.80 Euro spaghetti, of course) and which teams we supported in a strange mixture of French, German, English, "sign language", and even a word or two of Spanish. We all enjoyed our dinner and our talks, even if we sometimes didn't understand all of it. It sometimes only takes finding a little common ground to strike up a conversation, and in Europe, football seems to be a pretty good starting place.
I'm writing about football here not only because I want Germany to win the World Cup (I'm wearing a pair of shorts with German colors on them as we speak), but because it relates to some of the other themes I encountered while abroad. I had to interview my flatmates for a project for German class, and most of the questions were about patriotism, or "Patriotismus." When I asked two of them if and when they were proud of Germany, they both independently said "only during the World Cup." Most of my classmates got very similar answers from their flatmates, leading me to wonder why Germans are so hesitant to be patriotic. The short answer? Germany can't be patriotic with flags, glorious songs, and declarations of allegiance after Hitler and World War II. German nationalism is associated with too many horrific memories of the Third Reich, both for Germans and the rest of the world that witnessed that awful period of history. The long answer has more to do with the nature of patriotism in general, and I would never claim to be an expert on it, but my time in Freiburg really made me think about German patriotism, or the lack thereof, compared with American-style patriotism. I'm saving it for another post, but as long as everyone's waving their flags at the World Cup, I thought I'd put out a little introduction now. I'm sure our dinner friend is rooting for Spain, although maybe it was his homeland of France, or his neighbor Germany, or the object of his admiration, England...
Bis spaeter!
Saturday, June 19, 2010
One Month Later: The Things I Miss about Freiburg
Dryers that never dried my clothes
Wearing clothes that didn't fit quite right after hang-drying all semester long
The badly designed laundry card system in my creepy-as-hell laundry room
No free water in restaurants
Paying for public restrooms
Germans' inability to form lines
Clothing stores that were generally too expensive
Customer service that was often very poor
Getting shot down while trying to speak German
Everything being closed on Sundays
The Most:
Being able to walk everywhere
Being able to bike EVERYWHERE
Great public transportation for lazy days
The eco-friendly lifestyle
The view of and proximity to the Schwarzwald
How beautiful the city was
Free entrance on students' nights at our favorite clubs
Bakeries on every street
Butterbrezeln
The national obsession with ice cream
The Münster and the Münstermarkt
Living the student life in a university town
Seepark
Paying with coins
Wurst for two euros
Fasnacht
The German language, both speaking it and getting utterly defeated by it
Historic architecture (even if it did have to be rebuilt after the war)
Rothaus beer
O'Kelly's Pub and Das Quiz
"Gehen wir in die Mensa?" "Ja, wir gehen immer in die Mensa!"
Proximity to France and Switzerland
My flatmates
My IES friends
Moments that started like this:

And ended like this:

Even a month later, I still can't believe it's over.
Sunday, June 13, 2010
"Freedom"
I posted this quote because I've been thinking a lot about the word 'freedom' ever since Germany. I had a couple of good conversations with my flatmate about the way the government and media in the United States can use words with positive connotations, such as freedom, democracy, and justice, as justification for basically anything. I had never really thought in-depth about how ludicrous it is to use those types of words to describe acts of war. Over the past nine years, we've seen the "leader of the free world" engage in acts such as Operation Enduring Freedom (originally named Operation Infinite Justice) and Operation Iraqi Freedom. Where exactly does freedom come into these operations? One could argue, as the United States does, that the mission is to secure freedom and democracy where it doesn't exist, but it is freedom if a foreign power stages an invasion and asserts control, and if so, for whom? If we support the idea of a free market and Iraq just so happens to have oil, what kind of freedom are we actually seeking?
I think the term has become a deceptively nasty way to mask the horrors of war. When American citizens are constantly reminded to support the troops who are "fighting for your freedom," it becomes much easier to justify unilateral military action, invasions, civilian deaths, weapons of mass destruction, and the deaths of the poor soldiers themselves. First, the government convinces us that we want this vague ideal of freedom; then, it convinces us that the best way to achieve it is by waging war against our enemies abroad and against our civil liberties at home. It just astounds me how Americans can accept legislation like the PATRIOT Act or show support for racial profiling in the name of freedom, even though they both directly infringe upon our constitutional rights. The government's motive for using those kinds of terms is obvious, of course - it's so much easier to drum up support for ANY policy as long as the voting public believes it is just, free, and American. The part I can't believe is how incredibly detached we have become from the true meanings of the words we throw around. It is completely commonplace to see people protest gay marriage, abortion rights, and the idea of a Muslim president while simultaneously supporting the Iraq War, the use of corporate money in elections, and Arizona's draconian anti-immigrant laws, all in the name of freedom. That kind of "freedom" means nothing to me, and my conversations with my flatmate showed me how it often means nothing to the rest of the world either.
The mere fact that I can write this demonstrates some degree of real freedom, of course. My phone is probably not going to get wiretapped and I highly doubt I'll ever be brought in for questioning by the authorities. What's more likely, though, is that some people will accuse me of being "un-American" or that this blog will be used against me by an opponent if I ever run for office. Maybe that's the part that baffles me the most. If freedom is our country's ultimate ideal and the only thing I'm trying to do is promote REAL freedom, then why do people with similar views as me get vilified in the news or denounced as radicals? What's radical about protesting the government and media's misuse of a term that could mean so much, but has come to mean so little? I view dissent and debate as absolutely crucial in any effective civil society, and I think we come closer to true freedom when no one's views immediately get marked as anti-freedom or "anti-American." That phrase means even less to me than freedom does (although I suppose it means something to people like Rand Paul or Bill O'Reilly). There is nothing inherently American about the overarching concept of freedom, and I think the commonly accepted American version actually damages what the word is supposed to mean.
As a debater, I've encountered many cases about free speech and other civil liberties. One argument in particular often comes up, saying that no matter how vile, repulsive, or ridiculous a citizen's views might be, he or she should have a near-absolute legal right to express them. This allows people to march with the KKK or join the Westboro Baptist Church or believe that gay marriage is immoral. I agree with this argument completely, but not because I think the KKK has any worthy ideas. I agree because I think that dissent and debate will reveal and eventually eliminate the worst ideas and beliefs in society. Government doesn't need to intervene and it shouldn't have the right to do so. Blind acceptance of the word freedom or unfounded criticism of different political beliefs makes it easy to ridicule dissenters without actually thinking about what they have to say. This keeps bad ideas in circulation while preventing new ideas, whether good or bad, from entering the competition at all. That, I think, is dangerous for any society that gains its power from the people and their convictions.
All I want is for American citizens to truly think about the actions of our government without using the labels that have been pre-determined for us, making it possible to determine the validity of ideas, policies, and goals from a more neutral standpoint. This would, of course, be near-impossible with the strength of the mass media and our appetite for information. We certainly have to learn about policies somewhere, and nearly any source is going to have some degree of bias. I think we would at least be better off if we began to question the word freedom, which we hear so often without really hearing at all. Once we do that, I think we might come closer to recovering its true meaning, making it worthy of not only our respect, but the respect of the rest of the world.
Sunday, June 6, 2010
More to come...
My semester in Germany really made me think about a lot of things, but surprisingly, it made me think about American politics more than I ever have in my life (even though I'm majoring in politics at school). I need to get my thoughts properly formulated before I can do justice to everything I've been mulling over - if you're still interested, just trust I will write it soon! I'm currently reading some books and articles that are helping me figure things out, but I'll try to write the post as soon as possible even if I don't finish reading right away.
For now, here's the link to my most recent photo album. It sums up the spring and the end of the semester in beautiful Freiburg.
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=176752&id=599810215&l=bb68362a9c
Bis spaeter!
Sunday, May 23, 2010
Life in Germany
I think it would be useful to sum up my student life in Germany, especially if anyone reading this blog is interested in visiting or living there. I'm still formulating my political post because I've been doing quite a bit of thinking about it, and that will have to come at a later point. For now, I'll just break everything down into categories for the sake of simplicity. These are the issues that I thought about the most as a student.
Transportation: Germany wins here, hands down. Public transportation was fantastic in Germany, especially in my beloved Freiburg. The tram system was always clean, well-organized, on-time, and relatively cheap, especially with a monthly pass. It was also easy to figure out with a good website that had an English option in case the German was too confusing. I could get nearly anywhere I wanted in Freiburg with ease, although I didn't use the system more than once or twice after I bought my bike in April. The German train system, the Deutsche Bahn, was also great. It could not be easier to book tickets online, there are always good discounts if you know where to look, and it offers special deals like the Schoenes-Wochenende ticket that I've mentioned on this blog before. The trains are modern, fast, clean, and quiet, and the train stations are easy to navigate and well-marked, even in the small towns. Even with a bit of a language barrier, I found the Deutsche Bahn far easier to navigate than Caltrain, which I barely ever use and for good reason. Not only does taking Caltrain necessitate a 30-minute drive to Palo Alto, it just doesn't cover the same amount of ground and with the same efficiency. Trying to figure out public transportation in San Francisco is a hassle, especially if you need to use the subway AND above-ground transportation. Boston is quite a bit easier and has an excellent subway system, but the quality of the experience on its slow and old trains pales in comparison to my experiences in Germany. Finally, Germany is much more bike-friendly, especially in a green city like Freiburg. The bike lanes were always wide and well-marked, bike racks are available EVERYWHERE, and bike stores and repair shops are easy and accessible. I loved walking or biking around Freiburg and seeing people getting their groceries or running errands on a bike rather than in a car. This also has to do with city layouts - you don't see much of that suburban sprawl like we have in California where you really need a car to get to where you need to be. In Freiburg, all the main stores and establishments were downtown and easily accessible by subway, foot, or bike. Now that I'm home in rural La Honda, I really miss the ease of transport.
Food: The food in Germany was one of the highlights of my experience. Not only did I get the chance to try traditional specialties like Spargel, I got to enjoy the benefits of a country that just prizes food. Food and mealtimes are special in Germany, and you'd never see kids wolfing down TV dinners or parents buying Costco-sized bread rolls. Instead, families eat together, choose seasonal produce, buy fresh bread nearly every day, shun artificial ingredients, and generally relish eating as an experience. It wasn't hard for me to get into that - I could access high-quality produce, dairy products, and meats at my local grocery store for excellent prices. Sometimes I'd be thinking, "Oh, I've picked out a full basket of items, most of which are local or organic - I'd better break out the 50 Euro note" only to reach the line and face a bill of 15 Euros. Then, on the way out, I could stop by the bakery above the grocery store and get some fresh Brezeln or bread for a Euro or two. I could also access the farmers' market nearly every day, which was a truly great way to get any kind of vegetable or fruit I wanted. I've been fortunate enough to eat high-quality food and produce in the U.S. as well, but I think there is still a distinction in the eating cultures. You'd never see Germans do the Atkins diet - they're much thinner than we are as a whole, but if they want to lose weight, they'll exercise more and cut down on treats. Bread is an essential part of the German diet, and the Germans aren't willing to cut traditions or their way of life just to cut pounds. It was so nice and refreshing to live in a place that views food as something to be cherished rather than as something to be controlled.
Environment: I already knew that Freiburg is a green city (and is in fact the only city in Germany with a Green mayor), but I was still very impressed with how environmentally conscious everybody was. EVERYBODY recycles into five or six different categories, windmills grace the hills around the city, people bike or walk as much as possible, solar panel usage abounds, and nearly all new buildings must reach tough energy efficiency standards. This is true for much of Germany, but especially for Freiburg. The car-free neighborhood of Vauban is hyper-conscious about the environment - not only do most houses have solar panels and/or passive energy constructions, it costs 18 thousand Euros to park your car. Effective disincentive right there, I think! Environmental consciousness isn't casually dismissed as unrealistic or a luxury problem like it is the U.S. - EVERYONE can play a part, whether it's sorting through trash into the appropriate receptacles or buying an expensive passive house in Vauban. It's no secret that the U.S. lags far, far behind Europe in energy efficiency and surges way ahead in oil usage and emissions levels. No contest in this category.
Friendliness: I had heard lots of stereotypes about hostile Germans before I got here, but fortunately, they were wrong for me. It's true that Germans won't walk around and smile at every person they see, throw out a casual "how are you" out of habit, or say "we should hang out sometime!" just to be polite. What they will do, though, is enthusiastically greet their friends and acquaintances and really mean it when they ask how they are. Their friends will respond with a honest assessment of how they are rather than "I'm fine, and you?" If a German says "we should hang out," it means you'd better get out your calendar, set a firm date and time, and genuinely want to keep the meeting. If you don't feel like hanging out at a particular time, there's no need to do the old "Oh I'm so sorry, I really would, but I already promised I would do X on that day..." It's considered okay and non-offensive if you just don't feel like it. In many ways, I think Germans are friendlier than Americans. Americans will be aggressively cheery towards each other, but with a good deal of fakeness. Germans are more genuine, and at the same time, nice to strangers. I've asked for help with directions or whatever many times and every single person I asked was more than happy to help me out. I'm happy to say that this particular stereotype was debunked during my experience.
Education: Unlike in the U.S., nearly all of Germany's universities are public. The point I want to focus on is the vast difference in cost for German students versus American students. Students at public schools in the U.S. will pay at LEAST several thousand dollars per semester and usually more, while students at private schools encounter costs as high as $55,000 per year. Every time I told Germans this, their jaws dropped. They absolutely could not imagine how or why anyone could pay that much, even if they had enough money to easily do so. In Germany, tuition was banned until 2005 when states won the right to charge student fees. Even now, the states that have exercised this right (including Baden-Wuerttemberg, where Freiburg is) don't charge more than about 550 Euros per semester. While there are some other costs for students that can add up to a few thousand Euros, studying at the most expensive German university will still cost less than studying at the cheapest American state schools. When the 500-Euro fees were introduced at some German universities in 2007, students took to the streets in protest. They viewed the imposition of fees as an abridgment of their fundamental right to education. The charges would, in fact, make university prohibitively expensive for many students, effectively preventing them from exercising their rights under German law. The U.S. considers education a right until at least the 12th grade, but the more time I spent in Germany, the more I wondered why that right should suddenly cease after high school. True, we have federal financial aid, but the neediest families aren't going to find a measly $4,000 Pell Grant enough to cover even one semester at an average public school. Rather, too many students and families will find themselves drowning in debt after only a few years. German students aren't even familiar with the concept of student loan debt and would shake their heads in disbelief when I talked about it. I believe there should be as few financial obstacles as possible on the road to public higher education, and not because I think it would be a piece of cake to offer a fully funded education to all students at the college of their choice. Rather, the U.S. has a compelling interest in facilitating the university education of as many students as possible. Our economy and civil society would no doubt be better off if, like Germany, we truly viewed education as an investment rather than a cost.
This post came out a bit longer than I intended, so I'll cover a few more categories later on to avoid cramming everything into a monster post. I'll be offline for a few days, so bis spaeter!
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Reflections
Currencies Used: 5
Saturday, May 15, 2010
I'm Still Here
Monday, May 10, 2010
Fun in Freiburg
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Pictures from Friends
Monday, May 3, 2010
Castles on the Rhein and Roman Ruins
Last Leg: Athens and the Trek Home



Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Lovely Freiburg
Friday, April 23, 2010
Bucharest and Sofia
Our group in Bulgaria
Our academic meetings in Bulgaria were generally excellent. I especially enjoyed going to the Foreign Ministry, even though we only had half an hour to talk to the deputy foreign minister. At one point, he mentioned the need for stability in the Western Balkans given Bulgaria’s proximity, so I asked a question about potential EU accession for Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia given their political problems after the break-up of Yugoslavia. Like many of the politicians we spoke to, he emphasized that the two countries could join as soon as they fulfilled the accession criteria. This will be a struggle for those two in particular, but Croatia (another former Yugoslav state) is poised to join the EU soon. Slovenia already joined in 2004. I wish we had more time for questions, but we unfortunately had to leave before we could get really into it. I really appreciate the fact that IES arranged meetings with high-level politicians throughout our whole trip, even if they don’t always have a lot of time to speak to us.